John Moala Kaifa Banned from Security Work After Firearms Convictions

John Moala Kaifa’s career in the security industry has come to an abrupt end after a series of serious criminal convictions led to the immediate cancellation of his security certificate of approval (COA). The case was heard remotely on 18 March 2026, with the New Zealand Police representing the complaint against Kaifa. The 28-year-old did not attend the hearing, respond to the Police complaint, or seek any waiver under section 64 of the Private Security Personnel and Private Investigators Act 2010 — the law governing security personnel licensing in New Zealand.

On 20 February 2026, Kaifa was sentenced to one year of home detention following convictions on two Arms Act offences and one charge of possession of cannabis for supply. These are considered automatic disqualifications under section 62 of the Act, meaning his security license had to be cancelled unless a waiver was applied for — which Kaifa did not pursue.

While there was no evidence that these offences occurred during his work as a security guard, the PSPLA emphasized the severity of the crimes. “Behaviour of this nature, particularly firearms-related offending, is incompatible with someone whose role is to protect people and property,” the authority stated.

As a result of the convictions and the PSPLA’s findings, Kaifa’s COA was cancelled effective immediately. He has been ordered to return his security ID to the PSPLA within seven days of receiving the decision. The case highlights how seriously New Zealand’s security licensing authority treats criminal convictions. Even offences committed outside of work can permanently damage a person’s ability to work in security.

Kaifa’s situation serves as a warning for all security personnel. In New Zealand, the law is clear: any serious criminal offence, including those involving firearms or drugs, can automatically disqualify you from holding a security license. The PSPLA’s strict standards are intended to ensure that people working in security are trustworthy and capable of safeguarding others.

For Kaifa, failing to attend the hearing or request a waiver left him with no options to appeal. His case reinforces the importance of understanding the legal obligations and personal conduct expected in the security industry. https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Decisions/2026-NZPSPLA-018.pdf